I very recently finished reading Carl Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. In it, Sagan argues that scientific skepticism and critical thinking in general should be taught more rigorously in our nation’s schools as a means to strengthen our freedom and democracy. Sagan examines multiple topics of pseudoscience to show how a greater skepticism in the public would make fewer people so easily susceptible to claims such as telepathy, ESP, UFO sightings, alien abductions, and witchcraft.
Sagan demonstrates the beauty of scientific skepticism by indicating that he is ready to believe any of these claims, so long as there is adequate evidence to support them. In fact, Sagan was very much involved with the effort to seek out extraterrestrial life. But, as a good practitioner of scientific skepticism, he insisted on evidence.
As Sagan argues in the later chapters of the book, a public skepticism promotes freedom and democracy. Greater freedom is had by ensuring that the public does not blindly accept what those in authority dictate. The interests of democracy are preserved in scientific skepticism’s willingness to consider evidence and change opinions, views, and conclusions accordingly. That, I think, is at the heart of scientific skepticism: insist on good evidence and follow where the evidence leads.
If the public gains a greater appreciation for and awareness of the rigors of the scientific method and the rigors of the peer-review process, we will have a greater ability to sift the good science from the pseudoscience. Creationists sometimes claim that their articles are not published in peer-reviewed journals because the science cartel doesn’t agree with creationism. They may be correct that science doesn’t accept creationist dogma, but they are wrong in asserting that reason as the basis for any refusal to publish their work, if any. The reason their work is not published is because it is not science. It doesn’t employ the scientific method and it cannot withstand the scrutiny of its peers. So, it doesn’t get published in the peer-review process. If people understood this checks-and-balances system, perhaps we would not be expending energy to keep creationist teachings out of the public school system.
In any event, The Demon-Haunted World is an important book and we would do well to heed its advice.


